22. years old white, cis, bi girl reblogs social justice stuff + themed lolz. everyone is welcome, except bigots. Content from heartwarming to soulsucking (and triggery). So tread with caution.

“I got a fan letter from a young lady. It was a suicide note.

So I called her, and I said, “Hey, this is Jimmy Doohan. Scotty, from Star Trek.” I said, “I’m doing a convention in Indianapolis. I wanna see you there.”

I saw her — boy, I’m telling you, I couldn’t believe what I saw. It was definitely suicide. Somebody had to help her, somehow. And obviously she wasn’t going to the right people.

I said to her, “I’m doing a convention two weeks from now in St. Louis.” And two weeks from then, in somewhere else, you know? She also came to New York - she was able to afford to got to these places. That went on for two or three years, maybe eighteen times. And all I did was talk positive things to her.

And then all of the sudden — nothing. I didn’t hear anything. I had no idea what had happened to her because I never really saved her address.

Eight years later, I get a letter saying, “I do want to thank you so much for what you did for me, because I just got my Master’s degree in electronic engineering.”

That’s…to me, the best thing I’ve ever done in my life.”

(via marchingjaybird)

Source: lesliecrusher

The Problem with 'Boys Will Be Boys'

For months, every morning when my daughter was in preschool, I watched her construct an elaborate castle out of blocks, colorful plastic discs, bits of rope, ribbons and feathers, only to have the same little boy gleefully destroy it within seconds of its completion.

No matter how many times he did it, his parents never swooped in BEFORE the morning’s live 3-D reenactment of “Invasion of AstroMonster.” This is what they’d say repeatedly:

“You know! Boys will be boys!” 

“He’s just going through a phase!”

“He’s such a boy! He LOVES destroying things!”

“Oh my god! Girls and boys are SO different!”

“He. Just. Can’t. Help himself!”

I tried to teach my daughter how to stop this from happening. She asked him politely not to do it. We talked about some things she might do. She moved where she built. She stood in his way. She built a stronger foundation to the castle, so that, if he did get to it, she wouldn’t have to rebuild the whole thing. In the meantime, I imagine his parents thinking, “What red-blooded boy wouldn’t knock it down?”

She built a beautiful, glittery castle in a public space.

It was so tempting.

He just couldn’t control himself and, being a boy, had violent inclinations.

She had to keep her building safe.

Her consent didn’t matter. Besides, it’s not like she made a big fuss when he knocked it down. It wasn’t a “legitimate” knocking over if she didn’t throw a tantrum.

His desire — for power, destruction, control, whatever- - was understandable.

Maybe she “shouldn’t have gone to preschool” at all. OR, better if she just kept her building activities to home.

I know it’s a lurid metaphor, but I taught my daughter the preschool block precursor of don’t “get raped” and this child, Boy #1, did not learn the preschool equivalent of “don’t rape.

Not once did his parents talk to him about invading another person’s space and claiming for his own purposes something that was not his to claim. Respect for her and her work and words was not something he was learning.  How much of the boy’s behavior in coming years would be excused in these ways, be calibrated to meet these expectations and enforce the “rules” his parents kept repeating?

There was another boy who, similarly, decided to knock down her castle one day. When he did it his mother took him in hand, explained to him that it was not his to destroy, asked him how he thought my daughter felt after working so hard on her building and walked over with him so he could apologize. That probably wasn’t much fun for him, but he did not do it again.

There was a third child. He was really smart. He asked if he could knock her building down. She, beneficent ruler of all pre-circle-time castle construction, said yes… but only after she was done building it and said it was OK. They worked out a plan together and eventually he started building things with her and they would both knock the thing down with unadulterated joy. You can’t make this stuff up.

Take each of these three boys and consider what he might do when he’s older, say, at college, drunk at a party, mad at an ex-girlfriend who rebuffs him and uses words that she expects will be meaningful and respecte, “No, I don’t want to. Stop. Leave.”

The “overarching attitudinal characteristic” of abusive men is entitlement.

(via adventuresofcomicbookgirl)

Source: lastlifeinuniverse

Text

chekhov:

In health class we were given sheets of paper and told to write a message we would want someone of the opposite sex to know

She read some examples

The girls were like: “Hey can you please not treat me like shit”

The boys were like: “Spray tans look ugly I hate when girls wear too much makeup and don’t lead me on.”

(via aquiclude)

Source: chekhov

“‘We Have Always Fought’: Challenging the ‘Women, Cattle and Slaves’ Narrative” by Kameron Hurley — A Dribble of Ink

inky-petrel:

THIS.  This is fantastic. *applauds*  Also some fantastic artwork in the article.

(via marchingjaybird)

Source: inky-petrel

green-evening:

thesixpennybook:

Plus the fact that a number of prominent women in the BDSM community (eg. Maggie Mayhem and Kitty Stryker) have publicly come out and said that sexual abuse of women is absolutely rampant- Stryker has stated that she “[has] yet to meet a female submissive who hasn’t had some sort of sexual assault happen to her” [tw on that link for misogyny and sexual violence].

lol @ haters in the notes.
I was in the scene for years and witnessed (and experienced) tons of manipulation, lying, abuse, and circling the wagons around known abusers rather than admitting to the systemic problem of abuse and rape in the scene. I’ve known dozens of people who dropped out of the scene due to sanctioned abuse. I’ve had title holders and organization runners physically follow me around and touch me without my consent. I’ve had people send me disgusting messages about my status as a rape survivor. I’ve listened to sociopaths brag about “breaking” people and how fun it is to prey on 18 year old girls the second they enter the scene. I’ve attended consent workshops and classes led by people who everyone but me knew to be notorious serial abusers, who were protected by the “see no evil” attitude of scene leaders. I left the scene after a nationally known title holder—who uses his real name, as title holders tend to do—described, in graphic detail, how he raped an intoxicated and unconscious stranger and then bragged about how the stranger was afraid of him afterwards, and how that furthered his “leather journey.” It is this way everywhere. There are no exceptions and there are no safe spaces and there is nowhere—NOWHERE—that will put safety above the scene’s continued survival as a source of new sexual partners and of REVENUE (the scene can be incredibly lucrative to event planners, vendors, etc)
I invested years of my life into that bullshit and I am a worse and a poorer person for it, socially, financially, and morally. BDSM scene ain’t shit.

green-evening:

thesixpennybook:

Plus the fact that a number of prominent women in the BDSM community (eg. Maggie Mayhem and Kitty Stryker) have publicly come out and said that sexual abuse of women is absolutely rampant- Stryker has stated that she “[has] yet to meet a female submissive who hasn’t had some sort of sexual assault happen to her” [tw on that link for misogyny and sexual violence].

lol @ haters in the notes.

I was in the scene for years and witnessed (and experienced) tons of manipulation, lying, abuse, and circling the wagons around known abusers rather than admitting to the systemic problem of abuse and rape in the scene. I’ve known dozens of people who dropped out of the scene due to sanctioned abuse. I’ve had title holders and organization runners physically follow me around and touch me without my consent. I’ve had people send me disgusting messages about my status as a rape survivor. I’ve listened to sociopaths brag about “breaking” people and how fun it is to prey on 18 year old girls the second they enter the scene. I’ve attended consent workshops and classes led by people who everyone but me knew to be notorious serial abusers, who were protected by the “see no evil” attitude of scene leaders. I left the scene after a nationally known title holder—who uses his real name, as title holders tend to do—described, in graphic detail, how he raped an intoxicated and unconscious stranger and then bragged about how the stranger was afraid of him afterwards, and how that furthered his “leather journey.” It is this way everywhere. There are no exceptions and there are no safe spaces and there is nowhere—NOWHERE—that will put safety above the scene’s continued survival as a source of new sexual partners and of REVENUE (the scene can be incredibly lucrative to event planners, vendors, etc)

I invested years of my life into that bullshit and I am a worse and a poorer person for it, socially, financially, and morally. BDSM scene ain’t shit.

Source: nextyearsgirl

"There is no evidence beyond the barest speculation that allowing the abortion of nonviable fetuses generates a culture in which people take a more callous attitude toward the slaughter of children or adults. Abortion is, in effect, freely permitted in many European countries, and these are much less violent societies than many American communities are now or were when abortion was still mostly forbidden."

- the late Ronald Dworkin (via forthecatholicgirls)

(via commiekinkshamer)

Source: forthecatholicgirls

"Princeton University psychologist Susan Fiske took brain scans of heterosexual men while they looked at sexualised images of women wearing bikinis. She found that the part of their brains that became activated was pre-motor - areas that usually light up when people anticipate using tools. The men were reacting to the images as if the women were objects they were going to act on. Particularly shocking was the discovery that the participants who scored highest on tests of hostile sexism were those most likely to deactivate the part of the brain that considers other people’s intentions (the medial prefrontal cortex) while looking at the pictures. These men were responding to images of the women as if they were non-human."

Source: thoughtfulcynic

Ladies Club (1986). An oldie but a goodie. It actually surprises me more people do not know about this movie. It is an epic rape-revenge film, IMO.

(via commiekinkshamer)

Source: gynocraticgrrl

iamateenagefeminist:

stfuprolife:

We never talk about people who need or want abortions as living things.  All the focus goes on embryos, because for some reason, they’re more important than the people who are carrying them.

That is such a powerful sign…

iamateenagefeminist:

stfuprolife:

We never talk about people who need or want abortions as living things.  All the focus goes on embryos, because for some reason, they’re more important than the people who are carrying them.

That is such a powerful sign…

(via commiekinkshamer)

Source: sansastone

"But I don’t see homophobes as neutral parties. It’s not queer people are good, tacit homophobes are neutral, and people actually killing gay people are the bad guys. Tacit homophobia fosters an attitude that makes violent homophobia inevitable. People who don’t accept queer people 100% for who they are perpetuate the social structures that kill us. Even if they mean well. It’s even WORSE if they mean well, sometimes, because it means they get to distance themselves from the harm they inflict."

- christqueersandkarlmarx (via biblicalbelief)

(via commiekinkshamer)

Source: biblicalbelief